4.5 Review

The cross-mammalian neurophenomenology of primal emotional affects: From animal feelings to human therapeutics

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
Volume 524, Issue 8, Pages 1624-1635

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23969

Keywords

primal emotions; positive affective states; SEEKING (enthusiasm) system; PANIC (separation-distress) system; PLAY (social joy) system; animal psychiatric models; antidepressants; consciousness

Funding

  1. Hope for Depression Research Foundation (NYC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The neural correlates of human emotions are easy to harvest. In contrast, the neural constitution of emotional feelings in humans has resisted systematic scientific analysis. This review summarizes how preclinical affective neuroscience initiatives are making progress in decoding the neural nature of such feelings in animal brains. This has been achieved by studying the rewarding and punishing effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subcortical emotional networks (labeled SEEING, RAGE, FEAR, LUST, CARE, PANIC, and PLAY systems) that evoke distinct emotion action patterns, as well as rewarding and punishing effects in animals. The implications of this knowledge for development of new psychiatric interventions, especially depression, are discussed. Three new antidepressive therapeutics arising from this work are briefly noted: 1) DBS of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) in humans, 2) reduction of psychological pain that may arise from excessive PANIC arousal, and 3) facilitation of social joy through the study of social play in rats The overall argument is that we may more readily develop new psychiatric interventions through preclinical models if we take animal emotional feelings seriously, as opposed to just behavioral changes, as targets for development of new treatments. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:1624-1635, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available