4.7 Article

Validation of a subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome screening tool for motoric cognitive risk syndrome-A prospective cohort study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 2925-2933

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15476

Keywords

classification; cognition; dementia; epidemiology; gait

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01AG036921-01A1, R01AG044007-01A1, R01AG057548-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the validity of subjective cognitive and motoric complaints for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) and developed a score to define subjective MCR. The results showed that subjective MCR can serve as a remote screening assessment for MCR and help identify individuals at high risk for dementia.
Background and purpose Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a gait-based pre-dementia syndrome associated with risk of dementia. Ascertaining subjective cognitive and motoric complaints may facilitate early and remote identification of individuals with MCR as they are reported to precede and predict objective cognitive and motoric impairments in aging. Methods The validity of five subjective motoric complaint (SMC) questions and 10 subjective cognitive complaint (SCC) questions was examined for discriminating MCR in 538 non-demented community-dwelling adults. Backward logistic regression was used to identify questions to develop a weighted score to define subjective MCR (MCR-S). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the discriminative ability of MCR-S for the objective MCR (MCR-O) definition based on SCCs and objectively measured gait. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to examine the predictive validity of MCR-S for incident dementia. Results Five subjective complaint questions (three SCC and two SMC) were associated with MCR-O. They were combined to define an MCR-S score (range 0-7) which yielded an area under the curve of 0.89 for discriminating MCR-O from receiver operating characteristic analysis. An optimal cut-score of 2 on the MCR-S score was determined to have good sensitivity (84%) and specificity (82%) for MCR-O. Over a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 29 participants developed dementia. Both MCR-S (adjusted hazard ratio 2.39) and MCR-O at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio 3.16) predicted risk of incident dementia. Conclusions Subjective MCR had high concordance with MCR-O and can provide a remote screening assessment for MCR-O, which can identify those at high risk for dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available