4.7 Article

Artificial intelligence-powered programmed death ligand 1 analyser reduces interobserver variation in tumour proportion score for non-small cell lung cancer with better prediction of immunotherapy response

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 17-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.011

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; PD-L1; Non-small cell lung cancer; Digital pathology

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2019R1F1A1063372]
  2. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital [02-2017-0048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The AI-powered TPS analyser assists pathologists in improving consensus and prediction of therapeutic response. The study shows that the revision of TPS with AI assistance increases pathologists' concordance and reduces hazard ratio for overall survival and progression-free survival in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Background: Manual evaluation of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumour proportion score (TPS) by pathologists is associated with interobserver bias.Objective: This study explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered TPS analyser in minimisation of interobserver variation and enhancement of therapeutic response prediction.Methods: A prototype model of an AI-powered TPS analyser was developed with a total of 802 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whole-slide images. Three independent board certified pathologists labelled PD-L1 TPS in an external cohort of 479 NSCLC slides. For cases of disagreement between each pathologist and the AI model, the pathologists were asked to revise the TPS grade (<1%, 1%-49% and >50%) with AI assistance. The concordance rates among the pathologists with or without AI assistance and the effect of the AI-assisted revision on clinical outcome upon immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment were evaluated.Results: Without AI assistance, pathologists concordantly classified TPS in 81.4% of the cases. They revised their initial interpretation by using the AI model for the disagreement cases between the pathologist and the AI model (N Z 91, 93 and 107 for each pathologist). The overall concordance rate among the pathologists was increased to 90.2% after the AI assistance (P < 0.001). A reduction in hazard ratio for overall survival and progression-free survival upon ICI treatment was identified in the TPS subgroups after the AI-assisted TPS revision.Conclusion: The AI-powered TPS analyser assistance improves the pathologists' consensus of reading and prediction of the therapeutic response, raising a possibility of standardised approach for the accurate interpretation. 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available