4.5 Review

Practical considerations in epilepsy neurostimulation

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 63, Issue 10, Pages 2445-2460

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17329

Keywords

brain stimulation; DBS (deep brain stimulation); neuromodulation; RNS (responsive stimulation); VNS (vagus nerve stimulation)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for drug-resistant epilepsy patients. This review summarizes available neuromodulation techniques, focusing on patient selection, programming initiation, and outpatient management. Vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, and responsive neurostimulation have all shown safety and significant seizure reduction in randomized controlled trials. The choice of neuromodulation technique can be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.
Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for clinicians managing patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple devices are available with long-term follow-up and real-world experience. The aim of this review is to give a practical summary of available neuromodulation techniques to guide the selection of modalities, focusing on patient selection for devices, common approaches and techniques for initiation of programming, and outpatient management issues. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (DBS-ANT), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are all supported by randomized controlled trials that show safety and a significant impact on seizure reduction, as well as a suggestion of reduction in the risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Significant seizure reductions are observed after 3 months for DBS, RNS, and VNS in randomized controlled trials, and efficacy appears to improve with time out to 7 to 10 years of follow-up for all modalities, albeit in uncontrolled follow-up or retrospective studies. A significant number of patients experience seizure-free intervals of 6 months or more with all three modalities. Number and location of epileptogenic foci are important factors affecting efficacy, and together with comorbidities such as severe mood or sleep disorders, may influence the choice of modality. Programming has evolved-DBS is typically initiated at lower current/voltage than used in the pivotal trial, whereas target charge density is lower with RNS, however generalizable optimal parameters are yet to be defined. Noninvasive brain stimulation is an emerging stimulation modality, although it is currently not used widely. In summary, clinical practice has evolved from those established in pivotal trials. Guidance is now available for clinicians who wish to expand their approach, and choice of neuromodulation technique may be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available