4.7 Article

Novel iron sand-derived α-Fe2O3/CaO2 bifunctional catalyst for waste cooking oil-based biodiesel production

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 44, Pages 98832-98847

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21942-z

Keywords

Biodiesel; Bifunctional catalyst; Diglycerides; Fe2O3; CaO2; Iron sand; Simultaneous esterification-transesterification; Waste cooking oil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this research was to develop a bifunctional catalyst made of iron sand and different CaO2 sources for biodiesel production. It was found that CaCO3 was the best source of CaO2, and the Fe/Ca ratio of 1:4 resulted in the highest biodiesel yield.
The main aim of this work was to develop a heterogeneous Fe2O3/CaO2 bifunctional catalyst prepared from iron sand and 3 different CaO2 sources (CaCO3, Ca (OH)(2), and limestone) using wet impregnation and calcination methods for biodiesel production. The effects of different CaO2 sources and Fe/Ca ratio in the catalyst were investigated to provide insight into the catalyst character and biodiesel yield. X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, and scanning electron microscopy analyses were used to characterize the catalyst. CaCO3 was concluded as the best CaO2 source, while the best Fe/Ca configuration was found to be 1:4, giving the highest biodiesel yield (97.0401%) with no diglycerides. Greater addition of Fe loading would result in an amorphous structure, and all catalysts were relatively crystalline. Fe was concluded to favor the esterification reaction and biodiesel formation, while CaO2 was seen to favor the transesterification reaction and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) formation. The catalyst mechanism was also established in this study, where esterification of free fatty acid (FFA) and glycerol took place on the acid site to produce diglyceride and transesterification of triglyceride by methanol occurred on the basic site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available