4.7 Article

Pesticide risk assessment: honeybee workers are not all equal regarding the risk posed by exposure to pesticides

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 60, Pages 90328-90337

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21969-2

Keywords

Apis mellifera; Nurse; Forager; Pesticide sensitivity; Pesticide metabolization; Risk quotient

Funding

  1. European Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [773921]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toxicological studies have found that honeybees' responses to pesticides can vary due to individual differences in pesticide sensitivity and exposure. This study focused on the risk of pesticides to nurse and forager bees, which have different physiological backgrounds. The results showed that forager bees were more sensitive to sulfoxaflor compared to nurse bees, potentially due to differences in body weight. Additionally, foragers consumed more sugar syrup, especially when it was contaminated with pesticides. The study suggests that forager bees should be included in regulatory tests to ensure accurate assessment of pesticide risks to honeybees.
Toxicological studies in honeybees have long shown that a single pesticide dose or concentration does not necessarily induce a single response. Inter-individual differences in pesticide sensitivity and/or the level of exposure (e.g., ingestion of pesticide-contaminated matrices) may explain this variability in risk posed by a pesticide. Therefore, to better inform pesticide risk assessment for honeybees, we studied the risk posed by pesticides to two behavioral castes, nurse, and forager bees, which are largely represented within colonies and which exhibit large differences in their physiological backgrounds. For that purpose, we determined the sensitivity of nurses and foragers to azoxystrobin (fungicide) and sulfoxaflor (insecticide) upon acute or chronic exposure. Azoxystrobin was found to be weakly toxic to both types of bees. However, foragers were more sensitive to sulfoxaflor than nurses upon acute and chronic exposure. This phenomenon was not explained by better sulfoxaflor metabolization in nurses, but rather by differences in body weight (nurses being 1.6 times heavier than foragers). Foragers consistently consumed more sugar syrup than nurses, and this increased consumption was even more pronounced with pesticide-contaminated syrup (at specific concentrations). Altogether, the stronger susceptibility and exposure of foragers to sulfoxaflor contributed to increases of 2 and tenfold for the acute and chronic risk quotients, respectively, compared to nurses. In conclusion, to increase the safety margin and avoid an under-estimation of the risk posed by insecticides to honeybees, we recommend systematically including forager bees in regulatory tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available