4.7 Article

Climate policy for a net-zero future: ten recommendations for Direct Air Capture

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac77a4

Keywords

direct air carbon capture and storage; climate engineering; carbon dioxide removal; negative emissions technologies; greenhouse gas removal; net-zero

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the European Research Council (ERC) [951542-GENIE-ERC-2020-SyG]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct Air Capture with Carbon Storage (DACCS) technologies are important tools in tackling climate change, and this study provides ten recommendations for future DACCS policy based on expert interviews. The recommendations emphasize governance principles for achieving negative emissions, prioritizing long-term carbon storage, and the importance of scale.
Direct Air Capture with Carbon Storage (DACCS) technologies represent one of the most significant potential tools for tackling climate change by making net-zero and net-negative emissions achievable, as deemed necessary in reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the European Green Deal. We draw from a novel and original dataset of expert interviews (N = 125) to distil ten recommendations for future DACCS policy. After providing a literature review on DACCS and explaining our methods of data collection, we present these recommendations as follows: (a) follow governance principles that ensure 'negative' emissions; (b) prioritize long-term carbon storage; (c) appreciate and incentivize scale; (d) co-develop with capture, transport, and storage; (e) phase in a carbon price; (f) couple with renewables; (g) harness hub deployment; (h) maintain separate targets; (i) embrace certification and compliance; and (j) recognize social acceptance. All ten recommendations are important, and all speak to the urgency and necessity of better managing and shaping the potentially impending DACCS transition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available