4.7 Article

Changes in forest nitrogen cycling across deposition gradient revealed by δ15N in tree rings

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 304, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119104

Keywords

nitrogen; Phosphorus; Isotope; Eutrophication; Forest productivity; Tree species

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [18-17295 S]
  2. GACR project [20-19471 S]
  3. [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable N isotopes in tree rings provide helpful information on the trajectory of the N cycle over the last century with direct consequences for a better understanding of future interactions among N, P and C cycles in terrestrial ecosystems.
Tree rings provide valuable insight into past environmental changes. This study aimed to evaluate perturbations in tree ring width (TRW) and delta N-15 alongside soil acidity and nutrient availability gradients caused by the contrasting legacy of air pollution (nitrogen [N] and sulphur [S] deposition) and tree species (European beech, Silver fir and Norway spruce). We found consistent declines of tree ring delta N-15, which were temporarily unrelated to the changes in the TRW. The rate of delta N-15 change in tree rings was related to the contemporary foliar carbon (C) to phosphorus (P) ratio. This observation suggested that the long-term accumulation of N-15 depleted N in tree rings, likely mediated by retained N from deposition, was restricted primarily to stands with currently higher P availability. The shifts observed in tree-ring delta N-15 and TRW suggest that acidic air pollution rather than changes in stand productivity determined alteration of N and C cycles. Stable N isotopes in tree rings provided helpful information on the trajectory of the N cycle over the last century with direct consequences for a better understanding of future interactions among N, P and C cycles in terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available