4.6 Article

A Bregman-Split-Based Compressive Sensing Method for Dynamic Harmonic Estimation

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e24070988

Keywords

phasor estimation; Taylor-Fourier multi-frequency (TFM); compressive sensing (CS); Bregman split; cross entropy

Funding

  1. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2022YFG0300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a Bregman-split-based compressive sensing (BSCS) method to estimate the Taylor-Fourier coefficients in a multi-frequency dynamic phasor model. It transforms the phasor problem into a compressive sensing model based on the regularity and sparsity of the dynamic harmonic signal distribution, and derives an optimized hybrid regularization algorithm with the Bregman split method to improve the estimation accuracy.
In order to overcome the spectral interference of the conventional Fourier transform in the International Electrotechnical Commission framework, this paper introduces a Bregman-split-based compressive sensing (BSCS) method to estimate the Taylor-Fourier coefficients in a multi-frequency dynamic phasor model. Considering the DDC component estimation, this paper transforms the phasor problem into a compressive sensing model based on the regularity and sparsity of the dynamic harmonic signal distribution. It then derives an optimized hybrid regularization algorithm with the Bregman split method to reconstruct the dynamic phasor estimation. The accuracy of the model was verified by using the cross entropy to measure the distribution differences of values. Composite tests derived from the dynamic phasor test conditions were then used to verify the potentialities of the BSCS method. Simulation results show that the algorithm can alleviate the impact of dynamic signals on phasor estimation and significantly improve the estimation accuracy, which provides a theoretical basis for P-class phasor measurement units (PMUs).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available