Towards Generalizing the Information Theory for Neural Communication

Neuroscience extensively uses the information theory to describe neural communication, among others, to calculate the amount of information transferred in neural communication and to attempt the cracking of its coding. There are fierce debates on how information is represented in the brain and during transmission inside the brain. The neural information theory attempts to use the assumptions of electronic communication; despite the experimental evidence that the neural spikes carry information on non-discrete states, they have shallow communication speed, and the spikes' timing precision matters. Furthermore, in biology, the communication channel is active, which enforces an additional power bandwidth limitation to the neural information transfer. The paper revises the notions needed to describe information transfer in technical and biological communication systems. It argues that biology uses Shannon's idea outside of its range of validity and introduces an adequate interpretation of information. In addition, the presented time-aware approach to the information theory reveals pieces of evidence for the role of processes (as opposed to states) in neural operations. The generalized information theory describes both kinds of communication, and the classic theory is the particular case of the generalized theory.

Automated summary

The use of information theory in neuroscience is vital for understanding neural communication and decoding neural coding. There is a discrepancy in the representation of information in the brain and debates on how it is transmitted. The paper challenges the assumption that neural communication follows the principles of electronic communication and proposes an alternative interpretation of information in biology. Additionally, the paper introduces a time-aware approach to information theory, providing evidence for the importance of processes in neural operations.