4.7 Article

Processing and size range separation of pristine and magnetic poly(L-lactic acid) based microspheres for biomedical applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 476, Issue -, Pages 79-86

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.012

Keywords

Biocompatibility; Poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres; Oil in water emulsion technique; Cell viability; Magnetic nanocomposites

Funding

  1. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, grants [SFRH/BD/82411/2011, SFRH/BPD/90870/2012, SFRH/BD/98616/2013, SFRH/BPD/97739/2013]
  2. COST Action MP1206 Electrospun Nano-fibres for bio inspired composite materials and innovative industrial applications
  3. Basque Government Industry Department under the ELKARTEK Program
  4. Diputacion Foral de Bizkaia [267230]
  5. Diputacion Foral de Bizkaia under European Union's Seventh Framework Programme
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/98616/2013, SFRH/BD/82411/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodegradable poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) and PLLA/CoFe2O4 magnetic microspheres with average sizes ranging between 0.16-3.9 mu m and 0.8-2.2 mu m, respectively, were obtained by an oil-in-water emulsion method using poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) solution as the emulsifier agent. The separation of the micro spheres in different size ranges was then performed by centrifugation and the colloidal stability assessed at different pH values. Neat PLLA spheres are more stable in alkaline environments when compared to magnetic microspheres, both types being stable for pHs higher than 4, resulting in a colloidal suspension. On the other hand, in acidic environments the microspheres tend to form aggregates. The neat PLLA micro spheres show a degree of crystallinity of 40% whereas the composite ones are nearly amorphous (17%). Finally, the biocompatibility was assessed by cell viability studies with MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available