4.7 Article

Tunnelling-induced landslides: Trigging mechanism, field observations and mitigation measures

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106387

Keywords

Tunnelling-induced landslide; Field observation; Treatment measures; Entrance technology

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52008403, 51978669]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2020JJ5732, 2021JJ30825]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports a slope collapse accident at the entrance of Taizhen Tunnel in China, and investigates the mechanism of landslide instability through field observation and testing. Comprehensive reinforcement measures are proposed and their effectiveness is validated through monitoring data and numerical simulation. Lessons learned are summarized, providing insights for preventing similar incidents in the future.
This paper reports a collapse accident of slope instability at the entrance of Taizhen Tunnel in Qujiang Section of Hangxinjing Expressway in China. The landslide instability mechanism was studied by field observation and testing. Considering the stability of the landslide and the disturbance effect of secondary tunneling construction, comprehensive reinforcement measures were proposed. The monitoring data showed that good results were achieved. In addition, the effectiveness analysis of the treatment scheme was further examined via numerical simulation. The analysis results show that slope reinforcement before tunnel excavation can not only prevent slope failure but also reduce the deformation of the supporting structure. The improved double side-wall heading method has less disturbance to the slope and is more conducive to the overall stability of the slope. Finally, the lessons learned were summarized, providing insights for preventing future similar incidents from reoccurring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available