4.4 Article

Prediction of gas production potential based on machine learning in shale gas field: a case study

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2022.2100521

Keywords

Shale gas; feature selection; productivity prediction; machine learning; production prediction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study shows that machine learning methods can effectively predict the productivity of shale gas wells and accurately reflect the nonlinear relationship between influencing factors. The support vector machine regression model performs well in shale gas well productivity prediction, achieving high accuracy and providing guidance for predictions of other gas well productivity.
Productivity prediction is an important aspect of oil and gas exploration and development. As the amount of field data has increased, traditional engineering methods have begun to face challenges. The prediction of shale gas well production is influenced by geological, drilling, and completion characteristics. The relationship between variables is highly nonlinear and non-intuitive. In this study, 384 production well data were collected, including 14 input features and one output feature, with a total of 5,760 data points, 80% of which were used for training processes and 20% for testing processes. Four machine learning methods, namely an extreme gradient lifting tree, random forest, artificial neural network and support vector machine, were used to construct a shale gas well productivity prediction model. It was found that the machine learning method could accurately can well reflect the nonlinear relationship between the influencing factors and productivity. After the data were entered into the model training, regression evaluation indexes, such as the determination coefficient R-2, were used for measurement. Compared with other models, the support vector machine regression model with gamma (kernel coefficient) and C (punish coefficient) values of 1 and kernel function as the radial basis function have smaller errors. The mean absolute, mean square, and root mean square errors were 0.062, 0.006, and 0.077, respectively. The R-2 values for the training and testing sets were 0.861 and 0.843, respectively. The results indicated that the prediction accuracy of the support vector machine regression model is higher, and the accuracy of the training set reached 86%. The productivity prediction method we provide has a good guiding significance for other gas well productivity predictions while greatly reducing the uncertainty of gas field development and production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available