4.7 Article

Theorising member state lobbying on European Union policy on energy efficiency

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113057

Keywords

Energy efficiency; EU; EU policy; Interest groups; Lobbying; Policy change; Small states

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores and explains the lobbying of Member States on European Union policies, focusing on legislation regarding individual metering and billing in multi-apartment buildings. The successful lobbying strategy of Sweden and its allies in a lobbying coalition against the legislation is examined, along with the factors contributing to their success. The proactive approach and formation of a wide coalition of stakeholders played a crucial role in amending the legislation. Success was influenced by factors such as sufficient resources, high salience, and complexity of the issue.
This paper explores and explains Member State (MS) lobbying on European Union (EU) policy on energy efficiency, with particular focus on legislation on individual metering and billing of heating, cooling and domestic hot water (IMB) in multi-apartment buildings. This legislation has been heavily debated and was amended in 2018 following successful lobbying by the opponents of IMB. The lobbying strategy of Sweden, a small MS of the EU, and its allies in the lobbying coalition opposing IMB is examined, as are different factors explaining the success of their lobbying. A pro-active approach was taken and a broad normative coalition for lobbying was formed, including MSs and interest groups representing building owners and tenants at national and EU level. Lobbying was successful and the IMB provisions were amended. The success of the lobbying was influenced by several factors, i.a. favourable resources, high salience and high complexity of the issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available