Journal
ENERGY POLICY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113023
Keywords
Consumer preferences; Demand response; Quota scheme; Choice modeling; Hybrid choice model
Funding
- Germany Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy
- Sawtooth Software Inc
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined the preferences of German consumers regarding demand response (DR) programs, specifically quota schemes. The results showed that consumers' choices for quota scheme designs are mainly influenced by the time period of consumption restriction and financial compensation. Furthermore, the preferences shifted when consumers had the freedom to choose whether to participate or not, indicating that certain preferences for DR programs may not translate into willingness to participate. Additionally, sociodemographic characteristics had a limited influence on these preferences, with females, older individuals, and those purchasing green electricity showing slightly higher willingness to participate.
Demand response (DR) programs are increasingly discussed as policy options to facilitate an efficient energy transition. More recently, quota schemes, a novel type of incentive-based DR program that aims to restrict electricity consumption of some household appliances at certain times, have received considerable attention as a tool for preventing local grid congestion. However, little is known about the preferences of household consumers regarding the design of DR programs in general and quota schemes in particular. We examined the preferences of 1034 German consumers using data from a choice experiment. Our model results show that respondents' choices for quota scheme designs are mainly driven by the time period during which consumption is constrained, followed by the financial compensation. That said, the order of importance reverses if consumers are free to choose whether to participate or not, while the frequency and duration of DR measures remain unimportant. This shift in preferences suggests that preferences for certain DR programs may not necessarily translate into willingness to participate. Sociodemographic characteristics explain these preferences only to a limited extent, with female and older persons and persons currently purchasing green electricity showing a slightly higher willingness to participate. We discuss policy implications arising from these findings.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available