4.7 Article

Energy saving and CO2 reduction potential of external building walls containing two layers of phase change material

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124010

Keywords

Two PCM layers; Energy saving; Latent heat; PCM location; CO2 reduction; Thermal comfort

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using two layers of phase change material (PCM) is an effective method to reduce thermal loads in buildings. This study maximized the utilization of latent heat by splitting the PCM into two layers and adjusting their melting temperature, demonstrating that the design of two PCM layers can result in higher energy savings and improved thermal comfort.
Using two layers of phase change material (PCM) instead of one to improve the thermal energy storage of PCM is a promising way to minimize thermal loads in buildings. This study aimed to maximize the latent heat utilization by splitting the PCM into two layers and adjusting their location and melting temper-ature. Seven scenarios were created using one or two PCM layers on the inner side, outer side or both sides of an external wall. Energy savings analysis was carried out using a verified numerical model. The results indicated that the monthly optimum PCM melting temperature ranged from 5 degrees C to 30 degrees C. Two PCM layers, one on the outside side of the wall with a melting temperature of 17 ? and the other on the interior side with a melting temperature of 25 degrees C, resulted in higher annual energy savings (17.2%), compared to a single PCM layer (16.8%). With two PCM layers, the energy saving due to latent heat activation increased from 2.5% to 3.2%. Furthermore, this design reduced CO2 emissions by up to 18.4% and caused the surface temperature to approach the comfortable room temperature thereby decreasing thermal loads and improving thermal comfort. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available