4.5 Article

Techno-Economic Assessment of Solid-Liquid Biogas Treatment Plants for the Agro-Industrial Sector

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15124413

Keywords

cow manure; pig manure; biogas production; anaerobic digestion costs; the economic viability

Categories

Funding

  1. Bio-Smart Project
  2. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture based on a resolution of the German Bundestag (project management agency Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (FNR)) [FKZ: 22031318]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the economic viability of using cow manure and piglet manure in small-scale agricultural digesters and evaluates different treatment schemes. The research finds that utilizing agricultural waste for producing renewable electricity and heat is a financially profitable approach.
The urgent need to meet climate goals provides unique opportunities to promote small-scale farm anaerobic digesters that valorize on-site wastes for producing renewable electricity and heat, thereby cushioning agribusinesses against energy perturbations. This study explored the economic viability of mono-digestion of cow manure (CWM) and piglet manure (PM) in small manured-based 99 kW(el) plants using three treatment schemes (TS): (1) typical agricultural biogas plant, (2) a single-stage expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor, and (3) a multistage EGSB with a continuous stirred tank reactor. The economic evaluation attempted to take advantage of the financial incentives provided by The Renewable Energy Sources Act in Germany. To evaluate these systems, batch tests on raw and solid substrate fractions were conducted. For the liquid fraction, data of continuous tests obtained in a laboratory was employed. The economical evaluation was based on the dynamic indicators of net present value and internal return rate (IRR). Sensitivity analyses of the electricity and heat selling prices and hydraulic retention time were also performed. Furthermore, an incremental analysis of IRR was conducted to determine the most profitable alternative. The most influential variable was electricity selling price, and the most profitable alternatives were TS1 (CWM) > TS1 (PM) > TS3 (CWM). However, further studies on co-digestion using TS3 are recommended because this scheme potentially provides the greatest technical flexibility and highest environmental sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available