4.5 Review

Machine Learning Methods for Automated Fault Detection and Diagnostics in Building Systems-A Review

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15155534

Keywords

fault detection; fault diagnosis; machine learning; building systems; HVAC

Categories

Funding

  1. Texas AAMP
  2. M Engineering Experiment Station's Energy Systems Lab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy consumption is a significant cost in building operations, and faults can lead to increased energy consumption and reduced thermal comfort. Recent advancements in automated fault detection and diagnostics, as well as machine learning algorithms, offer opportunities for more accurate results. However, there are still obstacles to overcome for widespread adoption in commercial and scientific domains.
Energy consumption in buildings is a significant cost to the building's operation. As faults are introduced to the system, building energy consumption may increase and may cause a loss in occupant productivity due to poor thermal comfort. Research towards automated fault detection and diagnostics has accelerated in recent history. Rule-based methods have been developed for decades to great success, but recent advances in computing power have opened new doors for more complex processing techniques which could be used for more accurate results. Popular machine learning algorithms may often be applied in both unsupervised and supervised contexts, for both classification and regression outputs. Significant research has been performed in all permutations of these divisions using algorithms such as support vector machines, neural networks, Bayesian networks, and a variety of clustering techniques. An evaluation of the remaining obstacles towards widespread adoption of these algorithms, in both commercial and scientific domains, is made. Resolutions for these obstacles are proposed and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available