4.6 Article

Prediction method of important nodes and transmission lines in power system transactive management

Journal

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.107898

Keywords

Complex network; Electrical power system; Important node; Important transmission line; Prediction method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [51907109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a method for predicting important nodes and transmission lines in an electrical power system based on K-means and Markov chain. The method uses historical data mining and prediction to forecast important nodes and transmission lines in the power system. Simulation results prove the effectiveness and rationality of this method.
In the operation of electrical power system, there are a few nodes and transmission lines that may cause cascading failures. Nowadays, the algorithms for finding important nodes and transmission lines can only be used in real-time calculation, but does not have the ability to predict important nodes and transmission lines. In order to further prevent cascading failures of power system and provide early warning time for decision-makers, the K-means -Markov chain (K-M), a predicting method for the important nodes and transmission lines in electrical power system, is proposed in this paper, which consists of the historical data mining part based on K-means and the prediction part based on the Markov chain. Moreover, the initial clustering center determination mechanism of K-means also has been improved. The comparative simulation results of Back Propagation (BP) neural network method as well as the Single moving average method based on the IEEE 39-bus system and IEEE 118-bus system proved that the K-M method is reasonable and effective in forecasting important nodes and transmission lines of power system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available