Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Using evidence to direct quality improvement efforts: Defining the highest impact complications after complex cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer
Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2020)
The Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing Achieving Codman's Dream on a Nationwide Basis
Naomi Beck et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2020)
Impact of variation in cancer registration practice on observed international cancer survival differences between International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) jurisdictions
Michael Eden et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Evaluation of the French medical practices in endometrial cancer management by using quality indicators
E. Larouzee et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2019)
Older ovarian cancer survivors report lower long-term health-related quality of life than younger survivors: A study from the population-based profiles registry
I. C. van Walree et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation
Kahren M. White et al.
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2019)
A systematic literature review of trials of survivorship interventions for women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers
Vanessa L. Beesley et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE (2019)
Quality indicators for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer
Anne-Sophie Bonte et al.
EJSO (2019)
Variation in resource utilization associated with the surgical management of ovarian cancer
J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
Quality of Care and Outcomes of Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies Treated at Safety-Net Hospitals
Charlotte R. Gamble et al.
JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM (2019)
Quality Indicators and Survival Outcome in Stage IIIB-IVB Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated at a Single Institution
Inga Steinberga et al.
IN VIVO (2019)
Which patients are not included in the English Cancer Waiting Times monitoring dataset, 2009-2013? Implications for use of the data in research
C. Di Girolamo et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2018)
Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Outcomes Registry: From small beginnings come great things
Summer B. Dewdney et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2018)
Unplanned postoperative intensive care unit admission for ovarian cancer cytoreduction is associated with significant decrease in overall survival
Malcolm S. Ross et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2018)
Impact of institutional accreditation by the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology on the treatment and survival of women with cervical cancer
Mikio Mikami et al.
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2018)
Quality indicators for cervical cancer care in Japan
Tomone Watanabe et al.
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2018)
Is quality of registry treatment data related to registrar experience and workload? A study of Taiwan cancer registry data
Chin-Ying Cheng et al.
JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score
Seon Hee Park et al.
BMC CANCER (2018)
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
Freddie Bray et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2018)
Time to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: Compliance with ovarian cancer quality indicators at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center
Adam C. ElNaggar et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2018)
Predictors of Unplanned Reoperation for Ovarian Cancer Patients From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
Michael D. Toboni et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2018)
Data quality in the Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer - a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study
Per Rosenberg et al.
ACTA ONCOLOGICA (2018)
Ninety-Day Mortality as a Reporting Parameter for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction Surgery
Ryan J. Spencer et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2017)
Is Ovarian Cancer Being Managed According to Clinical Guidelines? Evidence From a Population-Based Clinical Audit
Simona Sobrero et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2016)
Costs of complications after colorectal cancer surgery in the Netherlands: Building the business case for hospitals
J. A. Govaert et al.
EJSO (2015)
EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum
Cornelis J. H. van de Velde et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2014)
Evaluation of the quality of the management of cancer of the corpus uteri - Selection of relevant quality indicators and implementation in Belgium
J. Werbrouck et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2013)
Factors Predictive of Postoperative Morbidity and Cost in Patients With Endometrial Cancer
Sean C. Dowdy et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2012)
Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward
Guy J. Maddern et al.
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA (2011)
Clinical audit in gynecological cancer surgery: Development of a risk scoring system to predict adverse events
Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2009)
Organisation and quality of primary surgical intervention for ovarian cancer in Denmark
Charlotte Marx et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2007)