4.7 Article

Distribution of ground-dwelling arthropods across landscapes with intensive agriculture in temperate areas*

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109042

Keywords

Pitfalls; Insects; Spiders; Spatial distribution; Body size; Illinois; the Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The idea that land use in the surroundings may affect the abundance of arthropods on a location plays an important role in the argument that agriculture is the prime cause of the recently discovered general decline of insects. Our study found that total arthropod abundance did not change with distance, but was influenced by vegetation height and landscape complexity. Vegetation height had a positive effect on abundance in crop land and a negative effect in grassland. Landscape complexity only affected abundance when measured on a larger scale.
The idea that land use in the surroundings may affect the abundance of arthropods on a location plays an important role in the argument that agriculture is the prime cause of the recently discovered general decline of insects. We studied the abundance of ground-dwelling arthropods in agricultural fields along a gradient of increasing distance from (semi)natural areas and in relation to landscape complexity in both the North America (Illinois, USA) and Europe (The Netherlands) using pitfalls. Our results showed that the total abundance did not change with distance when we controlled for vegetation height and landscape complexity around the sample locations. Vegetation height affected abundance positively in crop land and negatively in grassland. Landscape complexity only affected abundance when it was measured in a 6000 m radius around sample location, not at lower levels of scale. We conclude that an effect of increasing landscape complexity may be expected when that is done on a large enough scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available