4.4 Article

Reflections on the past, present and future of developmental biology

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 488, Issue -, Pages 30-34

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.05.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. BBSRC
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. NIH
  5. Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developmental Biology is a interdisciplinary field that tackles fundamental questions in Biology. The past 100 years have witnessed significant advancements, driven by new technologies and knowledge from other fields. However, the field has been rapidly changing in the past two decades, raising concerns. This article provides an overview of the changes that have occurred and calls for efforts to regain what has been lost in the field.
Developmental Biology embodies some of the most fundamental questions in Biology and can trace its roots back to several thousand years ago; the last 100 years have been particularly extraordinary. In part the advances have been fuelled by new technical advances and knowledge in many other areas, which have contributed to shaping the field as truly interdisciplinary. During those 100 years some of our predecessors identified some key questions and a few important principles especially by trying to find general rules that govern what cells are able to do and how they choose between different options, as well as principles of experimental design that can be used to uncover those rules even before we know their physicochemical underpinnings. But the field has been changing rapidly in the last two decades. Here I present a brief overview of some of the changes that have taken place over the last Century and a personal view of current directions. The picture that emerges is of some dark clouds on the horizon, so this is also a call to arms for our colleagues to try to regain what the field has been losing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available