4.6 Article

Molecular markers for hemocyte subpopulations in crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2022.104407

Keywords

Hemocytes; Molecular marker; Semigranular cells; Granular cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31672675, 31672691]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-48]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the protein content of two dominant hemocyte groups, GCs and SGCs, in crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Cell type-specific proteins were identified and their expression was further investigated. Molecular markers for GCs and SGCs were identified and their application in Eriocheir sinensis was analyzed. These molecular markers are useful tools for the research of crustacean hemocytes.
Semigranular cells (SGCs) and granular cells (GCs) are two dominant groups of circulating hemocytes in crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Molecular markers are required for the clear classification of the hemocytes and the research of their function and differentiation. In this study, we compared the protein content of GCs and SGCs by using two workflows: one-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by LC-MS/MS and in-solution digestion of cell lysate followed by LC-MS/MS. Cell type-specific proteins were identified, and their expression in SGCs and GCs was further investigated by RT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence analysis. Three molecular markers for GCs (peroxinectin, a mannose-binding protein, and prophenoloxidase-activating enzyme 2a) and three molecular markers for SGCs (a vitelline membrane outer layer protein I-like protein, a C-type lectin, and a peptidase) were identified. The application of some of the markers in Eriocheir sinensis was also analyzed. These molecular markers are useful tools for the research of crustaceans hemocytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available