4.5 Article

The effect of dermoscopy in assisting on defining surgical margins of basal cell carcinoma

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15711

Keywords

basal cell carcinoma; dermoscopy; dermoscopy manifestations; surgical margin; tumor margin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the diagnostic value of dermoscopy in defining the tumor margin of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and determines the appropriate surgical margin. The results show that dermoscopy is superior to visual inspection in defining the tumor margin of BCC and can guide the delineation of surgical margin.
To investigate the diagnostic value of dermoscopy in defining the tumor margin of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) for the appropriate surgical margin. A total of 107 BCC patients were enrolled for this study. The tumor boundaries were observed by naked eye and dermoscope respectively, and 5 mm outward was used as surgical margin according to the dermoscopy-defined margin. Pathological examinations were performed at 2 mm intervals in the direction previously marked and the effect was assessed accordingly There were still 16.8% of patients whose visual margin was insufficient to the dermoscopy-detected margin. With 2 mm excision margin from the dermoscopy-guided tumor margin, excision range in 12 patients (11.2%) proved to be inadequate, but only 18 surgical margins (4.2%) in the whole 428 excision margin specimens proved to be tumor-positive. While with 4 mm margin, residual lesion was observed in 2 (0.5%) of 107 BCC patients, and positive margin was found in 2 (0.3%) of 428 margin specimen. There has been no recurrence in our study so far. Dermoscopy is superior to visual inspection for defining BCC tumor margin. Under preoperative dermoscopy detection, a 4 mm excision margin of BCC can achieve a radical resection rate of 98.1%, and 92.3% for a 2 mm excision margin of pigmented BCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available