4.4 Review

Association of Cognitive Impairment With Mortality and Readmission in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis

Journal

CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101354

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Suqian Science and Technology Support Project Fund [K201907]
  2. Jiangsu 333 Talent Fund [BRA2020016]
  3. Zhenjiang Key Research and Development Fund [SH2021038, 47:101354]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive impairment is frequent in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with increased all-cause mortality and readmission rates. This association remains significant even after adjusting for other confounding factors.
Cognitive impairment is a frequent condition in patients with heart failure (HF). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of cognitive impairment on all-cause mortality and readmission among HF patients. We systematically searched articles indexing in PubMed and Embase databases until August 5, 2022. Original studies investigating the association of cognitive impairment with mortality and/or readmission for more than 3-month follow-up in patients with HF were selected. Twelve studies including 9556 patients were eligible. The prevalence of cognitive impairment ranged from 13.5% to 63.4% in HF patients. For patients with cognitive impairment vs those without, the pooled adjusted risk ratio (RR) was 1.88 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.42-2.48) for all-cause mortality, 1.48 (95% CI 1.19-1.84) for readmission, and 1.53 (95% CI 1.35-1.73) for combined endpoints of all-cause mortality/readmission, respectively. Cognitive impairment is a significant predictor of all-cause mortality/readmission in patients with HF, even after adjustment for the conventional confounding. Evaluation of cognitive function may help to improve risk classification of HF patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available