4.1 Review

Recent advances in the management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 441-447

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000901

Keywords

interstitial lung disease; management; systemic sclerosis; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review highlights recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis, including screening and early diagnosis, disease progression assessment and monitoring, and treatment approaches.
Purpose of review Interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) is a frequent organ manifestation leading to high morbidity and mortality. In 2020, the European management recommendations for SSc-ILD were published. Despite being comprehensive, several questions could not be answered or no consensus was reached. Recent findings We highlight recent advances in the screening and early diagnosis, including surveys emphasizing that still 30-40% of all experts do not order baseline HRCTs in their SSc patients. We discuss recent advances in the assessment of disease progression, risk prediction and monitoring of SSc-ILD including novel insights in the disease course of SSc-ILD, clinical predictive factors for disease progression, the role of increasing extent of ILD on serial HRCT and radiomics, PET/CT and home spirometry as sensitive future tools to monitor SSc-ILD patients. We describe recent advances in the treatment of SSc-ILD, including novel data and trials as well as post hoc analyses of clinical trials on mycophenolate, cyclophosmphamide, tocilizumab, rituximab, riociguat and nintedanib. Lastly, we elucidate on peripheral blood cell gene expression profiling as a novel way to identify patients with a better treatment response to mycophenolate. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the management of SSc-ILD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available