4.3 Review

CGM in the Hospital: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

Journal

CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 451-460

Publisher

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11892-022-01484-x

Keywords

Continuous glucose monitoring; Diabetes; Inpatient glucose management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the hospital setting is growing, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent studies have shown that CGM is accurate and effective in reducing hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients, and can also improve glycemic control. Additionally, CGM can reduce nursing workload, cost, and minimize face-to-face patient care during the pandemic.
Purpose of Review The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the hospital setting is growing with more patients using these devices at home and when admitted to the hospital, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent Findings Historically, most evidence for CGM use in the inpatient setting was limited to small studies utilizing outdated CGM technology and analyzing accuracy of sensor measurements. Previous studies have shown reduced sensor accuracy during extreme hypo- or hyperglycemia, rapid fluctuations of glucose, compression of the sensor itself, and in those who are critically ill. Studies that are more recent have shown CGM to have adequate accuracy and may be effective in reducing hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients; some studies have also showed improvement in time in target glycemic range. Furthermore, CGM may reduce nursing workload, cost of inpatient care, and use of personal protective equipment and face-to-face patient care especially for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review will describe the evidence for use of CGM in hospitalized critically ill or non-critically ill patients, address accuracy and safety considerations, and outline paths for future implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available