4.0 Article

Case series-COVID-19 is unlikely to affect male fertility: Results of histopathological and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis

Journal

CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages E558-E562

Publisher

CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7850

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is unlikely to affect male fertility. Contrary to all prior histological studies, our results showed no evidence of damage to reproductive tissues that might impair fertility.
Introduction: We aimed to analyze the testicular histopathology of men who died with active COVID-19 infection.Methods: We performed autopsy of eight consecutive men who died of COVID-19 pneumonia. Lung and testis tissue of all men were stained for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor immunohistochemistry (IHC). H&E was performed to assess for spermatogenesis and evidence of testicle tissue damage. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis for SARS-CoV-2 was performed on matched lung and bilateral testicular tissue samples from all men.Results: Patient age ranged from 50-79 years. SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was detected by RTPCR in testis tissue in one man. All eight testicle specimens that underwent IHC for ACE2 receptor showed uniformly strong immunoreactivity against all testicle cell popu-lations. By H&E, all testis specimens showed no inflammation, vascular thrombosis, vasculitis, or morphological evidence of viral changes. One case showed diminished but not absent spermato-genesis, consistent with patient age.Conclusions: Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is unlikely to affect male fertility. Contrary to all prior histological studies, our results showed no evidence of damage to reproductive tissues that might impair fertility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available