4.5 Article

Towards equitable public sector plant breeding in the United States

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 2076-2090

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20800

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant breeding is crucial to agriculture and has led to significant changes in agricultural production systems with social, political, economic, and environmental consequences. Reflecting on the history of plant breeding in the United States, this perspective essay explores the need for equitable food systems and proposes a framework for equitable plant breeding to encourage reflection, discussions, and actions towards greater equity in the food and seed systems.
Plant breeding is central to agriculture and shifts in plant breeding practices (e.g., hybrid development) and selection goals (e.g., response to synthetic fertilizer) have catalyzed monumental and persistent changes in agricultural production systems of all scales with social, political, economic, and environmental repercussions. Although plant breeders are largely trained in the sciences of biology, genetics, and statistics, we posit an ethical imperative to examine the degree of equity with which the benefits of new research and plant cultivars are distributed. In the United States, the history of plant breeding parallels the colonial history of agriculture, which compels reflection by current plant breeders about their role in shaping our agricultural system. In this perspective essay, we examine longstanding ideas about equitable food systems through the lens of public plant breeding in the United States. We propose a framework for equitable plant breeding with respect to both its process and outcomes, and we intend for the ideas presented herein to catalyze reflection, discussions, and actions as the plant breeding community seeks greater equity in the food and seed systems our work supports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available