4.7 Article

Oxidation behaviour of eutectic refractory high-entropy alloys at 800-1000 °C

Journal

CORROSION SCIENCE
Volume 205, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110464

Keywords

Refractory high-entropy alloys; Oxidation; Eutectic structure; High temperatures; Oxidation kinetics

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-79-30066]
  2. Joint Research Center of Belgorod State National Research Uni- versity Technology and Materials
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2021-690, RF--2296.61321 0030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the oxidation behavior of refractory high-entropy alloys with different compositions. It was found that increasing the Al/Ti ratio reduced the mass gain but resulted in oxide scale spallation. The studied alloys demonstrated better oxidation resistance than the current high-entropy alloys at 800 degrees C. Analysis of the alloy with near-parabolic oxidation kinetics revealed the formation of an external oxide layer primarily composed of TiO2 and an internal reaction zone with O-rich products and TiN.
Herein, we investigated the oxidation behaviour of B2/C14 Laves phase hypoeutectic Al23Cr20Nb15Ti32Zr10, eutectic Al28Cr20Nb15Ti27Zr10, and hypereutectic Al33Cr20Nb15Ti22Zr10 (at%) refractory high-entropy alloys (RHEAs) at 800-1000 degrees C. An increase in the Al/Ti ratio reduced the mass gain, but induced an oxide scale spallation. Before spallation, the studied alloys demonstrated better oxidation resistance than the current Al-Cr-Nb-Ti-(V)-Zr RHEAs at 800 degrees C. An analysis of the Al23Cr20Nb15Ti32Zr10 alloy with near-parabolic oxidation ki-netics revealed the formation of an external oxide layer with a dominant TiO2 and an internal reaction zone comprised O-rich products and TiN. The oxidation mechanisms and suggestions for improving the oxidation/spallation resistance were discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available