Journal
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128172
Keywords
Magnesium oxychloride cement; Sawdust; Water resistance; Modification; Citric acid; Tartaric acid
Categories
Funding
- Nature Science Foundation of China [52068008]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study investigates the effects of adding modifiers, including citric acid, tartaric acid, sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium phosphate, and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer emulsion, to the sawdust-magnesium oxychloride cement composite (SMOCC). The results show that these modifiers delay the setting time, improve water resistance, and enhance the microstructure and hydration mechanism of SMOCC. However, EVA decreases the strength of SMOCC and has no significant effect on water resistance improvement.
Sawdust-magnesium oxychloride cement composite (SMOCC) consists of a magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) matrix, sawdust, and modifiers. SMOCC is expected to become a building material to replace wood. However, poor water resistance limits its application in engineering. To improve the properties of SMOCC, citric acid (CA), tartaric acid (TA), sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP), sodium phosphate (NaP), and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) emulsion were added to SMOCC in this study. The effects of these modifiers on SMOCC setting time, compressive strength, and water resistance were studied. Assisted by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the effects of modifiers on the microstructure and hydration mechanism of SMOCC were analyzed. Results show that adding the modifiers delays the setting time of SMOCC, among which CA has the best setting retardation effect. CA and TA both inhibit the continuous hydrolysis of MgO and the decomposition of 5MgO center dot MgCl2 center dot 8H(2)O (phase 5.1.8) crystals in water, which results in an obvious improvement of the water resistance of SMOCC. In terms of the modification effects on SMOCC, SHMP is better than NaP at increasing the setting time, maintaining the volume stability, and improving the water resistance, the microstructure, and hydration products of SMOCC, while EVA decreases the strength of SMOCC and has no obvious effect on the improvement of the water resistance.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available