4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Phytoplankton Dynamics in Three Metropolitan Beaches of the Amazon Littoral (Sao Luis-Maranhao)

Journal

JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 413-417

Publisher

COASTAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.2112/SI75-083.1

Keywords

biomass; microalgae; coastal areas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was based on a spatial-temporal analysis of the phytoplankton of three beaches in Sao Luis (Maranhao) with the aim of understanding the influence of the factors on the phytoplankton community. Samples were obtained in the dry season (December 2008 and October 2009) and the rainy season (March and June, 2009), and were collected using internationally standardized methods. Salinity was significantly higher during the dry season, while temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, turbidity and dissolved nutrient concentrations (nitrate) were all significantly higher during the rainy season. Diatoms contributed to the high taxonomic richness observed at all the beaches. Total phytoplankton density and chlorophyll-a concentrations (20.9 mg.m(-3); B1) were highest during the rainy months, with significantly higher densities being observed at B3 (1274.3 x 10(3) cell.L-1). The cluster analysis revealed the formation of two groups influenced by seasonality, reflecting the relative homogeneity of the beaches. The results indicate that the variation in the composition and density of the phytoplankton is determined by the high degree of interaction between the highly hydrodynamic characteristics typical of Amazonian environments and the local rainfall cycle, which modulates the other environmental variables, such as salinity and dissolved nutrient concentrations, thus affecting the dynamics of coastal phytoplankton communities. The strong antropogenic influence observed in these urban beaches (sewage effluent discharges) also interfered within the dynamics of local phytoplankton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available