Uncertainty-aware selecting for an ensemble of deep food recognition models

Deep learning is a machine learning technique that has revolutionized the research community due to its impressive results on various real-life problems. Recently, ensembles of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have proven to achieve high robustness and accuracy in numerous computer vision challenges. As expected, the more models we add to the ensemble, the better performance we can obtain, but, in contrast, more computer resources are needed. Hence, the importance of deciding how many models to use and which models to select from a pool of trained models is huge. From the latter, a common strategy in deep learning is to select the models randomly or according to the results on the validation set. However, in this way models are chosen based on individual performance ignoring how they are expected to work together. Alternatively, to ensure a better complement between models, an exhaustive search can be used by evaluating the performance of several ensemble models based on different numbers and combinations of trained models. Nevertheless, this may result in being high computationally expensive. Considering that epistemic uncertainty analysis has recently been successfully employed to understand model learning, we aim to analyze whether an uncertainty-aware epistemic method can help us decide which groups of CNN models may work best. The method was validated on several food datasets and with different CNN architectures. In most cases, our proposal outperforms the results by a statistically significant range with respect to the baseline techniques and is much less computationally expensive compared to the brute-force search.

Automated summary

Deep learning is a powerful machine learning technique that has produced impressive results in various real-life problems. Ensemble models of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have proven to be robust and accurate in computer vision challenges. The selection of models in an ensemble is crucial, and uncertainty-aware methods may help determine the best groups of CNN models.