Journal
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 3746-3769Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12998
Keywords
Food fraud; seafood supply chain; RASFF; HorizonScan; Food Fraud Database; Nexis
Categories
Funding
- Department for the Economy Northern Ireland
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Seafood is a commodity that is highly susceptible to food fraud due to its complex and opaque supply chains. This study analyzes reported seafood fraud incidents and identifies illegal veterinary residues as a significant concern, with most reports originating from farmed seafood in Vietnam, China, and India. The analysis also highlights the frequency of fraudulent or insufficient documentation in internationally traded goods, indicating deceptive practices further down the supply chain.
Due to complex, valuable, and often extremely opaque supply chains, seafood is a commodity that has experienced a high prevalence of food fraud throughout the entirety of its logistics network. Fraud detection and prevention require an in-depth understanding of food supply chains and their vulnerabilities and risks so that food business operators, regulators, and other stakeholders can implement practical countermeasures. An analysis of historical criminality within a sector, product, or country is an important component and has not yet been conducted for the seafood sector. This study examines reported seafood fraud incidents from the European Union's Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed, Decernis's Food Fraud Database, HorizonScan, and LexisNexis databases between January 01, 2010 and December 31, 2020. Illegal or unauthorized veterinary residues were found to be the most significant issue of concern, with most reports originating from farmed seafood in Vietnam, China, and India. For internationally traded goods, border inspections revealed a significant frequency of reports with fraudulent or insufficient documentation, indicating that deceptive practices are picked up at import or export but are occurring further down the supply chain. Practices such as species adulteration (excluding veterinary residues), species substitution, fishery substitution, catch method fraud, and illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing were less prevalent in the databases than evidenced in the scientific literature. The analysis demonstrates significant differences in outcomes depending on source and underlines a requirement for a standardized and rigorous dataset through which food fraud can be scrutinized to ensure enforcement, as well as industry and research resources are directed accurately.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available