4.7 Article

State space reconstruction techniques and the accuracy of prediction

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106422

Keywords

State space reconstruction; Nonlinear prediction; Correlation dimension

Funding

  1. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, science, research and sport of the Slovak Republic [VEGA 2/0023/22]
  2. Slovak Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine the best reconstruction method when the quality of prediction of the studied observable is the criterion. Different reconstruction methods were tested, and it was found that the numerical estimates were almost the same, but the prediction results were significantly influenced by the type of reconstruction.
If the data is dominated by deterministic dynamics, then a one-dimensional measurement of a single observable is sufficient to essentially reconstruct a potentially multidimensional state portrait of the entire governing dynamics. Our goal in this study was to find out which method of reconstruction is best to choose when the criterion is the quality of prediction of the studied observable. Several methods of reconstructing the state space portrait from a single time series were tested: uniform, non-uniform and weighted delay coordinates, an approach using principal components, and Xu's differential reconstruction. In addition to predictability, we also evaluated the accuracy of estimating the complexity of a reconstructed attractor by a correlation dimension. We found that the numerical estimates of the correlation dimension were practically the same using different reconstructions. The prediction, on the other hand, was significantly influenced by the type of reconstruction. When trying to predict as accurately as possible, it is worth considering weighted delay coordinates, or approximations of derivatives instead of the standard uniform time delay embedding.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available