4.5 Review

Using the Intranasal Route to Administer Drugs to Treat Neurological and Psychiatric Illnesses: Rationale, Successes, and Future Needs

Journal

CNS DRUGS
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 739-770

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00930-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [CHRPJ-508393-2017]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CPG-151963]
  3. Milken Institute [2021-0825]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intranasal drug delivery to the brain shows potential for treating neurological and psychiatric illnesses, but challenges remain. This review discusses the current understanding of this drug delivery pathway and addresses barriers to drug transport. It also explores the development of nanoparticle systems for delivering drugs to the brain.
While the intranasal administration of drugs to the brain has been gaining both research attention and regulatory success over the past several years, key fundamental and translational challenges remain to fully leveraging the promise of this drug delivery pathway for improving the treatment of various neurological and psychiatric illnesses. In response, this review highlights the current state of understanding of the nose-to-brain drug delivery pathway and how both biological and clinical barriers to drug transport using the pathway can been addressed, as illustrated by demonstrations of how currently approved intranasal sprays leverage these pathways to enable the design of successful therapies. Moving forward, aiming to better exploit the understanding of this fundamental pathway, we also outline the development of nanoparticle systems that show improvement in delivering approved drugs to the brain and how engineered nanoparticle formulations could aid in breakthroughs in terms of delivering emerging drugs and therapeutics while avoiding systemic adverse effects. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available