4.6 Article

Medication Adherence Measurement Methods in Registration Trials Supporting the Approval of New Medicines: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Centralized Procedures in the European Union 2010-2020

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages 1051-1060

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2709

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Short-Term Scientific Mission (STSM) grant from COST Action [CA19132]
  2. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medication adherence is a key factor affecting the efficacy and safety of medicines, but how it is addressed in European registration trials remains unknown. This study analyzed the marketing authorization dossiers of new medicines approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2010 and 2020. The findings reveal significant variations in adherence measurement methods and definitions across different therapeutic areas and trials. Standardization of adherence definitions and measurement methods is necessary for a better understanding and comparison of medication efficacy.
Medication adherence is a key factor impacting efficacy and safety of medicines, yet how it is dealt with in European registration trials is unknown. A cross-sectional analysis of European Medicines Agency (EMA) marketing authorization dossiers for new medicines approved through centralized procedures in the European Union between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Data were extracted from European Public Assessment Reports and Clinical Study Reports. Clinical trials covering five therapeutic areas were included: diabetes, respiratory conditions, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, and oncology. Outcomes included adherence assessment, measurement methods, and rates. Overall, 102 medicines studied in 253 clinical trials were reviewed. All but one study reported measuring adherence. Two hundred twenty trials (87%) measured adherence using quantitative methods, while 32 (13%) trials monitored adherence but did not further quantify. Reported adherence rates were high (> 90%) across trials yet marked disparities in measurement methods and definitions were found. The most frequently used adherence measurement method was pill/dose count (single method: 52.7%; in combination: 37.7%; with patient diary/report: 17.3%; electronic methods: 1.4%; bioanalytical methods: 4.1%). Patient diary/report (6.4%) and electronic methods (2.7%) were also used as single methods. Electronic methods were more often used in respiratory and anti-infective trials, while bioanalytical methods were more frequently used in diabetes. Overall, adherence is measured in EMA registration trials, yet the methods used and the way in which adherence rates are presented vary widely between trials and therapeutic areas. To better understand and compare efficacy of medicines, standardization of adherence definitions and measurement methods is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available