4.3 Article

Impaired fibrinolysis in severe Covid-19 infection is detectable in early stages of the disease

Journal

CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 183-191

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/CH-221491

Keywords

Covid-19; Coagulopathy; ROTEM; Visco-elastic testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the changes of coagulation markers at the time of presentation for Covid-19 patients and their correlation with disease severity. The results showed that critically ill patients had reduced ability to break down clot mass, indicating a potential predictor of disease severity.
BACKGROUND: A significant degree of mortality and morbidity in Covid-19 is due to thromboembolic disease. Coagulopathy has been well described in critically unwell patients on ICU. There is less clear evidence regarding these changes at the time of presentation to the Emergency Department and the progression of disease over time. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether coagulation markers can predict severity and how they change over the disease course. METHODS: Patients presenting to a single University Teaching Hospital were recruited and followed up if PCR was positive. Alongside routine blood testing, Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was performed. Outcome data was recorded for all patients, and ROTEM values were compared across outcome groups. RESULTS: Extem and Intem Maximum Lysis were significantly reduced in those who died or required an ICU admission, indicating a reduced ability to break down clot mass in the most critically unwell patients. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons between groups demonstrated that one distinguishing feature between those who require ICU admission or die of Covid-19 compared with those who survive a hospital stay to discharge was the extent to which fibrinolysis could occur. Mortality and morbidity in Covid-19 infection appears in part driven by an inability to break down clot mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available