4.6 Article

Short-term biological variation of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue 11, Pages 1813-1819

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0480

Keywords

biological variation; biomarkers; depressive disorder; glial fibrillary acidic protein; individual; nervous system diseases

Funding

  1. Harboefonden
  2. Dagmar Marshalls Fond

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serum GFAP exhibits relatively low within-subject variation but considerable between-subject variation, and shows marked semidiurnal variation. Therefore, caution should be exercised in blood sampling and interpreting GFAP, especially in conditions where only small GFAP differences are observed.
Objectives Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an emerging biomarker for intracerebral diseases and is approved for clinical use in traumatic brain injury. GFAP is also being investigated for several other applications, where the GFAP changes are not always outstanding. It is thus essential for the interpretation of GFAP to distinguish clinical relevant changes from natural occurring biological variation. This study aimed at estimating the biological variation of serum GFAP. Methods Apparently healthy subjects (n=33) had blood sampled for three consecutive days. On the second day, blood was also drawn every third hour from 9 AM to 9 PM. Serum GFAP was measured by Single Molecule Array (Simoa (TM)). Components of biological variation were estimated in a linear mixed-effects model. Results The overall median GFAP value was 92.5 pg/mL (range 34.4-260.3 pg/mL). The overall within- (CVI) and between-subject variations (CVG) were 9.7 and 39.5%. The reference change value was 36.9% for an increase. No day-to-day variation was observed, however semidiurnal variation was observed with increasing GFAP values between 9 AM and 12 PM (p<0.00001) and decreasing from 12 to 9 PM (p<0.001). Conclusions Serum GFAP exhibits a relatively low CVI but a considerable CVG and a marked semidiurnal variation. This implies caution on the timing of blood sampling and when interpreting GFAP in relation to reference intervals, especially in conditions where only small GFAP differences are observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available