4.1 Article

Geographic access to eye health services in Aotearoa New Zealand: which communities are being left behind?

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages 158-164

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2102410

Keywords

Aotearoa New Zealand; area-level deprivation; eye care access; health equity; travel distance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the distribution and accessibility of eye health services in New Zealand and identified communities that require geographically accessible eye health services. The findings showed that most New Zealanders live within 10 km of eye health services, but there are communities with longer travel distances and higher deprivation that need affordable eye health services.
Background This study aimed to determine the distribution of - and geographic access to - eye health services in Aotearoa New Zealand. We further sought to identify communities who might benefit from provision of eye health services that were more geographically accessible. Methods We obtained addresses of optometry and ophthalmology clinics from regulatory bodies and augmented this with online searches. Address locators were created using a Land Information dataset and geocoded using ArcGIS 10.6. A national population was derived using Statistics New Zealand's Integrated Data Infrastructure. We generated population-weighted centroids of each of New Zealand's 50,938 meshblocks and calculated the travel distance along the road network between each clinic and population (meshblock centroid). The proportion of the population living >50 km from each clinic type was calculated; as was the median, inter-quartile range and maximum distance across area-level deprivation quintiles in each district. Results A national population of 4.88 million was identified, as were addresses for 344 optometry, 46 public ophthalmology and 90 private ophthalmology clinics. Nationally and within each district, travel distance to optometry was shorter than to either type of ophthalmology clinic. The region of Northland - with a high proportion of the population Maori and in the highest quintile of area-level deprivation - had the furthest average distance to travel to optometry and public ophthalmology, while the West Coast region on the South Island had the farthest to travel to private ophthalmology. Several communities were identified where longer distances intersected with higher area-level deprivation. Conclusion Most New Zealanders live within 10 km of eye health services. However, to achieve equitable eye health, strategies are required that make affordable eye health services accessible to communities for whom large travel distances intersect with high deprivation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available