4.6 Article

Leading modes of wind field variability over the western Tibet Plateau

Journal

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
Volume 60, Issue 3-4, Pages 1239-1251

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-022-06358-2

Keywords

Western Tibet Plateau; Western Tibetan Vortex; MV-EOF; Leading mode; Horizontal wind fields

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identifies the dominant wind patterns over the western Tibet Plateau using MV-EOF analysis. It finds that the wind field in most seasons over the plateau shows high similarity to the Western Tibetan Vortex.
Atmospheric circulations bring moisture from above the ocean to the high mountains of the western Tibet Plateau (TP), thus wind variability is of great importance to the water cycle centered on the western TP. This study therefore examines the leading modes of the wind fields over the western TP. We use the multivariate empirical orthogonal function (MV-EOF) analysis method to detect the dominant wind patterns above the western TP. This method extracts the leading modes of combined meridional and zonal wind variability at 200-hPa in the region of 22 degrees N-50 degrees N, 50 degrees E-92 degrees E. We find the first leading mode of the combined zonal and meridional wind field in the annual mean and in most seasons (spring, summer and autumn) over the western TP shows high similarity to the Western Tibetan Vortex (WTV), a large-scale atmospheric vortex-like pattern recently recognized over the western TP. In winter, the WTV, however, is closer to the second leading mode. We estimate the sensitivity of our results by changing the domain of the MV-EOF analysis region surrounding the western. We find the influence of the WTV is less sensitive to analysis location around the western TP. In short, the WTV generally represents the first leading mode of the wind field in most seasons over the western TP. This study augments our knowledge on wind variability over the western TP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available