Journal
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 3093-3144Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-022-02346-6
Keywords
Sustainable development; Legislation changes; Mixed plastic waste; Thermochemical conversion technologies; Environmental and resource sustainability; Life cycle inventory modelling
Categories
Funding
- Croatian Science Foundation [IP-01-2018-3200]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The EU legislation lacks detailed regulations on energy recovery of waste and groups all thermochemical conversion technologies together. This research evaluates the technologies for plastic waste recovery and highlights the need for revising existing legislation and technology classifications. The study finds that pyrolysis and gasification have lower impacts on global warming, abiotic depletion, and cumulative energy demand compared to incineration. Alternative thermochemical recovery technologies can contribute to sustainable development goals by reducing environmental impacts and import dependence.
The EU legislation put the focus on the material recovery of waste while energy recovery is not elaborate enough and all thermochemical conversion technologies are classified in the same category regardless of the final products, which can hamper overall sustainability. Therefore, this research analyses technologies for recovery of plastic waste to review the existing EU legislation and technology classifications. Most important LCA impact categories from the legislation point of view were identified and used in the analysis. As alternative thermochemical recovery technologies are not widely used, their inventories were modelled based on an extensive literature review. Results show that pyrolysis of plastic waste has 46%, 90%, and 55%, while gasification up to 24%, 8%, and 91%, lower global warming, abiotic depletion, and cumulative energy demand-related impacts, respectively, compared to incineration with CHP generation. Incineration-based scenarios show lower impacts only in the acidification potential category which is dependent on energy mixes of substituted energy vectors which are quickly changing due to the energy transition. Thus, alternative thermochemical recovery technologies can help in reaching sustainable development goals by lowering environmental impacts and import dependence. But, before considering new investments, the substitution of less environmentally sustainable fuels in facilities like cement kilns needs to be looked upon. Results of this analysis provide levelized results for environmental and resource sustainability based on which current legislative views on individual thermochemical recovery technologies may be re-examined. [GRAPHICS] .
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available