4.5 Article

Lattice thermal conduction in cadmium arsenide

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS B
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac7863

Keywords

dirac semimetals; Cd3As2; thermal conductivity; phonon scattering

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC), India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lattice thermal conductivity (LTC) of cadmium arsenide (Cd3As2) has been studied over a wide temperature range using the Callaway model. The study shows the relative importance of different scattering mechanisms on the LTC. It is found that for low temperatures, LTC fits well with the experimental data, but for high temperatures, the contribution of electronic scattering mechanisms needs to be considered.
Lattice thermal conductivity (LTC) of cadmium arsenide (Cd3As2) is studied over a wide temperature range (1-400 K) by employing the Callaway model. The acoustic phonons are considered to be the major carriers of heat and to be scattered by the sample boundaries, disorder, impurities, and other phonons via both Umklapp and normal phonon processes. Numerical calculations of LTC of Cd3As2 bring out the relative importance of the scattering mechanisms. Our systematic analysis of recent experimental data on thermal conductivity (TC) of Cd3As2 samples of different groups, presented in terms of LTC, kappa (L), using a nonlinear regression method, reveals good fits to the TC data of the samples considered for T < similar to 50 K, and suggests a value of 0.2 for the Gruneisen parameter. It is, however, found that for T > 100 K the inclusion of the electronic component of TC, kappa (e), incorporating contributions from relevant electron scattering mechanisms, is needed to obtain good agreement with the TC data over the wide temperature range. More detailed investigations of TC of Cd3As2 are required to better understand its suitability in thermoelectric and thermal management devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available