4.1 Article

Self-biting behavior in patients with neonatal brachial plexus palsy

Journal

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 38, Issue 9, Pages 1773-1776

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05574-9

Keywords

Brachial plexus; Neonatal brachial plexus palsy; Pain; Self-mutilation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 612 patients with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) and identified 15 patients with self-biting behavior (2.5%). This behavior is usually associated with severe motor involvement and lasts for several months. Physical restriction is an effective treatment to prevent finger amputation.
Purpose Self-biting behavior in patients with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) has been associated with finger amputation. Our objective is to describe the incidence of this complication, risk factors, and clinical management. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 612 patients with NBPP. There were 303 males and 309 females. 51.8% of patients had C5-C6 lesions, 28.9% had C5-C7, 18.9% had C5-T1, and 0.3 had C7-T1 involvement. Results We identified 15 patients with self-biting behavior (2.5%). Ten patients had C5-T1 lesions, and five had C5-C7 lesions. Eight patents were submitted to brachial plexus surgery and seven were not. This behavior appeared between 8 and 46 months of life (mean 23.5), and it was always temporary. There was no difference between operated and non-operated patients (p > 0.05), and no correlation between age at surgery and age of appearance of self-biting behavior (p > 0.05). Physical restriction was effective in treating this complication and we had no case of finger amputation. Conclusion Self-biting behavior is a rare complication of NBPP, and it is usually associated with severe motor involvement. The behavior duration is limited to a few months. This condition can be effectively treated with physical restriction to prevent hand biting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available