4.5 Article

The Evaluation of l-Tryptophan Derivatives as Inhibitors of the l-Type Amino Acid Transporter LAT1 (SLC7A5)

Journal

CHEMMEDCHEM
Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202200308

Keywords

Amino acid transporter; cancer; LAT1 inhibitor; structure-activity relationships; tryptophan

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation through the National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) TransCure
  2. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of derivatives of the substrate amino acid l-tryptophan have been investigated for inhibition of the L-type amino acid transporter LAT1. The 5-substituted derivative showed the highest potency, while the replacement of the carboxy group led to a complete loss in potency. Increasing the steric bulk at the 5-position did not improve the inhibitory activity. None of these derivatives were found to be substrates for LAT1-mediated transport.
A series of derivatives of the substrate amino acid l-tryptophan have been investigated for inhibition of the L-type amino acid transporter LAT1 (SLC7A5), which is an emerging target in anticancer drug discovery. Of the four isomeric 4-, 5-, 6-, or 7-benzyloxy-l-tryptophans, the 5-substituted derivative was the most potent, with an IC50 of 19 mu M for inhibition of [H-3]-l-leucine uptake into HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells. The replacement of the carboxy group in 5-benzyloxy-l-tryptophan by a bioisosteric tetrazole moiety led to a complete loss in potency. Likewise, the corresponding tetrazolide derived from l-tryptophan itself was found to be neither a substrate nor an inhibitor of the transporter. Increasing the steric bulk at the 5-position, while reasonably well tolerated in some cases, did not result in an improvement in potency. At the same time, none of these derivatives was found to be a substrate for LAT1-mediated transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available