4.6 Review

Solar Driven Gas Phase Advanced Oxidation Processes for Methane Removal - Challenges and Perspectives

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 28, Issue 64, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202201984

Keywords

advanced oxidation process; chlorine; methane oxidation; ozone; photocatalysis; photoreactor

Funding

  1. European Commission H2020 Marie S Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) award [871998]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan (Key Special Project of Inter-governmental National Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation) [2019YFE0197500]
  3. Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor Plan
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [871998] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper highlights the urgency to reduce CH4 emissions to limit global warming, emphasizing the need for large-scale methane removal methods. It also discusses the challenges and prospects of solar-driven gas phase advanced oxidation processes for CH4 removal while proposing ideas to help make these processes deployable at a climate significant scale.
Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas and the second highest contributor to global warming. CH4 emissions are still growing at an alarmingly high pace. To limit global warming to 1.5 degrees C, one of the most effective strategies is to reduce rapidly the CH4 emissions by developing large-scale methane removal methods. The purpose of this perspective paper is threefold. (1) To highlight the technology gap dealing with low concentration CH4 (at many emission sources and in the atmosphere). (2) To analyze the challenges and prospects of solar-driven gas phase advanced oxidation processes for CH4 removal. And (3) to propose some ideas, which may help to develop solar-driven gas phase advanced oxidation processes and make them deployable at a climate significant scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available