4.7 Review

Lead time of early warning by wastewater surveillance for COVID-19: Geographical variations and impacting factors

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 441, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135936

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; Temporal and spatial variation; WBE; Seasonality; COVID-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper evaluates the global data on temporal tracking of COVID-19 through wastewater surveillance, focusing on the robustness, advantages, and sensitivity of the wastewater-based epidemiological (WBE) approach. The study highlights the variations in lead time reported globally and the factors impacting the comparability of WBE results, such as gene copies detected, lag time, and per capita RNA concentrations. It also emphasizes the influence of sanitation facilities and climatic conditions on the degradation rate of the virus and the applicability of WBE in WASH countries.
The global data on the temporal tracking of the COVID-19 through wastewater surveillance needs to be comparatively evaluated to generate a proper and precise understanding of the robustness, advantages, and sensitivity of the wastewater-based epidemiological (WBE) approach. We reviewed the current state of knowledge based on several scientific articles pertaining to temporal variations in COVID-19 cases captured via viral RNA predictions in wastewater. This paper primarily focuses on analyzing the WBE-based temporal variation reported globally to check if the reported early warning lead-time generated through environmental surveillance is pragmatic or latent. We have compiled the geographical variations reported as lead time in various WBE reports to strike a precise correlation between COVID-19 cases and genome copies detected through wastewater surveillance, with respect to the sampling dates, separately for WASH and non-WASH countries. We highlighted sampling methods, climatic and weather conditions that significantly affected the concentration of viral SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in wastewater, and thus the lead time reported from the various climatic zones with diverse WASH situations were different. Our major findings are: i) WBE reports around the world are not comparable, especially in terms of gene copies detected, lag-time gained between monitored RNA peak and outbreak/peak of reported case, as well as per capita RNA concentrations; ii) Varying sanitation facility and climatic conditions that impact virus degradation rate are two major interfering features limiting the comparability of WBE results, and iii) WBE is better applicable to WASH countries having well-connected sewerage system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available