4.7 Article

Radiation shielding and structural features for different perovskites doped YBa2Cu3Oy composites

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 48, Issue 13, Pages 18855-18865

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.162

Keywords

Perovskite ceramic; Radiation shielding; X-ray diffraction; Gamma; Neutron; Charged particles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the structure and properties of ceramic materials doped with perovskite oxides for use in radiation shielding. Experimental results show that these ceramic materials have different structures and shielding properties, indicating their potential for use as shielding materials.
The increased demand for ionizing radiation in various fields led to the search for new shielding substances. In this study, five samples of perovskite oxides (BaTiO3, SrTiO3, BaTiO3-SrTiO3, and PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3) doped YBa2-Cu3Oy ceramics were prepared to explore their structure and ability for exploitation in the radiation shielding field. The structural properties were explored by using the XRD technique. The XRD results showed an orthorhombic structure for all prepared ceramics. The crystallite size reduces gradually from 96.19 to 66.63 nm with adding different perovskite oxides into the composites. The density shows a variation from about 5.89 to 6.23 g/cm(3). The mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) was defined experimentally (MAC)(exp) and theoretically (MAC)the to check its validity. The maximum relative difference between (MAC)(exp) and (MAC)(the) is 7.83%. YBa2Cu3O7/(PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3)(2%) and YBa2Cu3O7/(BaTiO3-SrTiO3)(2%) samples showed superior gamma shielding properties and mass stopping power (MSP) for charged particles, respectively, while the pristine YBa2Cu3O7 sample has a better fast neutron removal cross-section (sigma(R)). From the obtained results, it can be seen a slight variation in shielding properties, indicating the ability to use the different ceramic samples as radiation shielding materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available