4.7 Article

Mixed-mode fracture behaviour of refractories with asymmetric wedge splitting test. Part II: Experimental case study

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 48, Issue 14, Pages 19757-19766

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.244

Keywords

Wedge splitting test; Asymmetric angle; Mixed-mode fracture; In-plane shear; Magnesia refractories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51902228, U21A2058, U1908227, 2019YFC1904903]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the influence of different levels of mode II loading on the damage behavior of refractories with different brittleness was experimentally investigated using the asymmetric wedge splitting test. The results showed that as the asymmetric wedge angle increased, the fracture behavior became more unstable, with steeper load-displacement curves and faster energy release.
The asymmetric wedge splitting test for performing mixed-mode loading and its numerical evaluation has been presented in a companion paper (Part I). In this work (Part II), the influences of various levels of mode II loading on damage behaviour of refractories with different brittleness were experimentally investigated by comparing mode I and mixed-mode fractures under symmetric and asymmetric wedge splitting loading with seven different wedge angles. The digital image correlation technique was also used for strain maps visualization as well as the deformation parameters acquisition. With the increase of asymmetric wedge angle, the fracture behaviour becomes unstable what is associated with steeper load-displacement curves, more instantaneous energy release and restrained fracture process zone development. The in-plane shear loading contributes to the accelerated extension of the crack tip and its deviation from central plane. Meanwhile, the co-existing local shear stresses caused by the refractory's heterogeneity lead to crack path deflection as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available