4.7 Review

Lighting up Nobel Prize-winning studies with protein intrinsic disorder

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 79, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-022-04468-y

Keywords

Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions; Nobel Prize; Disorder prediction; Computational methods

Funding

  1. DFG [RTG 2467, 391498659]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDPs and IDRs) are increasingly recognized in biology, and their importance is demonstrated by their involvement in Nobel Prize-winning discoveries. While the specific molecular functions of IDPs and IDRs are still being determined, their presence in various biological processes highlights their significance in biology.
Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDPs and IDRs) and their importance in biology are becoming increasingly recognized in biology, biochemistry, molecular biology and chemistry textbooks, as well as in current protein science and structural biology curricula. We argue that the sequence -> dynamic conformational ensemble -> function principle is of equal importance as the classical sequence -> structure -> function paradigm. To highlight this point, we describe the IDPs and/or IDRs behind the discoveries associated with 17 Nobel Prizes, 11 in Physiology or Medicine and 6 in Chemistry. The Nobel Laureates themselves did not always mention that the proteins underlying the phenomena investigated in their award-winning studies are in fact IDPs or contain IDRs. In several cases, IDP- or IDR-based molecular functions have been elucidated, while in other instances, it is recognized that the respective protein(s) contain IDRs, but the specific IDR-based molecular functions have yet to be determined. To highlight the importance of IDPs and IDRs as general principle in biology, we present here illustrative examples of IDPs/IDRs in Nobel Prize-winning mechanisms and processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available